Carl Olsen
All these Shark tank type programming and attempts to validate wealth through entrepreneurship as some sort of validation for inequality has been a recent attempt. Steve Harvey is trying to bring one another these programs as television becomes more and more a business-centric propagandizing tool for the one percent with these business reality programs pitching their ideas in a studio audience which will vote on which silly idea is the best and deserving of money. It is too bad a live studio audience cannot make this same decision concerning television programming. Steve Harvey though is just this programs court jester and the real developer is producer mark Burnett whose goals of programming glorifying the business class instead of having programs of debate and questioning why the private industry spends so much on research and fighting political and social progress. The likes of Mark Burnett have thrived with programming intended to stay as far away from relevant social topics of inequality as possible as the son of a pig has produced a slew of reality programming which rich men like him rightfully figure will never deal with important economic topics and debate of the day. Burnett has brought such important social programming as "survivor" "Shark Tank" "voice" "and celebrity apprentice". The idiot Steve Harvey said he was proud to be part of this program as a show like this gives dreams and vehicle into their dreams. these programs need to be see for what they are basically is putting inequality programming that never deals with important and crucial questions of the day and that people need to come up with a consumer product to fulfil their dreams and climb the ladder if success instead of pressing government to tax and treat all of their citizens equally. They need to press their governments more against the likes of a Mark Burnett and Steve Harvey who use television programming as a vehicle to increase the idea that inequality is an earned byproduct of ingenuity and those with it usually earned it.
No comments:
Post a Comment