Dr Nassar likely would defend Charlie Hebdo terrorist act

Dave Berkson
    Taking classes from an Islamic propagandist and apologist such as Dr Nasser often made me wonder what this dweeb would say now in his enfeeble Mid-East political Science classes. He often said that the power of their religion forbid any drawings and caricatures of Muhammad. Numerous attempts by Western writers have been condoned through the Islamic world and the drawing of Muhammad had indeed provoked outrage in the Islamic world long before the 2006 attacks on Danish embassies throughout the Islamic world. Dr Nassar would of said then and just now that Muslim anger directed at editorial offices is provoked by these editorial boards that know better than to allow drawings of Muhammad. The poison of the pen was a subject that Dr Nassar often brought up in how the Middle East mindset does not allow criticism of a revered belief system that is key to their survival and identity. he would say how the free European press would indulge in humiliating the religion for decades and this in turn created forces in the Arab world. This include forces of frustration, forces of humiliation, and forces of anger. Such forces of change found their outlet of rage through a number of instruments of mobilization that ultimately brought down some governments and are poised to bring down a few more. Dr Nassar would hope to this day it includes the government of France for allowing something as appalling as a newspaper that allowed mockery of Islamic values and principles. Freedom of speech to defend Islamic  principles and values is one thing but to be critical of the prophet and to show what it represents is another principle that cannot be tolerated.

No comments:

Post a Comment