Sam Harris debates anti-American radical old geezard Noam Chomskey

Andy Cruz
   Noam Chomsky loves to equate the United states with being more terrorist than Muslim radicals and Sam Harris decided to call this guy out for this. Chomsky like many others on the radical left ignore the destructions of right-wing religious Islamic extremism and instead focus on the United States because we are the only superpower in the world. When you are in charge you become a target and because we are in charge and not Islam Noam Chomsky has been allowed to live a full old life. This should e the end of the debate right there between the hero of new atheism who rightfully calls out Islam for the Nazisistic ideology which it is. if Noam Chomsky was a critic of the Islamic faith like a Salmine Rushdie and others this guy would never had made it to the ripe age of ninety six or ninety one years of age. Harris has a public email debate that many Islamiloving liberal writers and sites proudly proclaimed Chomsky the winner. a Chomsky somehow relates one bombing in terrorist protecting Sudan in 1998 of a suspected chemical plant that he says was a pharmaceutical plant as somehow the same as 9/11. This shows the bias wickedness and abject stupidity of this argument. empowering third-world dictators and terrorists is a goal of the likes of noam Chomsky's who deplore sanctions over Iraq through the years that prevented more arms sales and crackdowns on the Kurds and other internal dissidents of the Saddam Hussein regime that an ass like Noam Chomsky had little quarrel. This guy thinks that the deaths through sanctions would not have occurred anyway without them as a Saddam Hussein would of gladly shared the country's profits with the Shiite majority or Kurdish minority. Chomsky is nauseating to read, infuriating to listen to, and he is excruciating to look at.The fact that the United States was responding to a terrorist declared war against its entire overseas interests and role of providing the world access to trade and development produces this tribalistic, medieval backlash of hate from much of the rural Islamic world refusing to enter the age of modernity or individual thought. Noam Chomsky sees the world through a telescope where all of the problems are blamed to one state and ideology which for some reason he prefers not to see spread and improved through much of the barbaric world. For Chomsky the targeting of civilians is defensible if you are the oppressed and fighting against empire and values of a bigger power like the United States and this is why he downplays the atrocities of 9/11 terrorists and instead focuses on are attempts to weed out the nature of a terrorist world element against any forms of civility they disagree based on their interpretations of the Koran. Sam Harris brought out the ignorance and likely mental instability of a Noam Chomsky where debate is not encouraged and defense of his expressions and ridicules  views not necessary. This old fuck just makes a living knocking America and western thought,freedoms, and values and this is how he sells books. As Harris brilliantly illustrated Chomsky is not about detailed defense of his idiocentric views of hate for America but to have a one way dialogue with his supporters and backers in the liberal media.