David Pakman and Kyle Kulinski irked by report left-wing Youtubers being owned and dominated

Money Talk
  Tony Miselli
   David Pakman and Kyle Kulinski did a conference YouTube discussion both irritated by an article declaring that left-wing media is getting owned on YouTube. Pakman and Kulinski claim they are getting much more views ad downloads than right-wing rival. Kulinski and Pakman claim to have huge audiences and creating more important buzz than Alex Jones and Stephan Crowder. Pakman and Kulinski bashed this article that right-wing You tubers are dominating the political discussion on this website. Pakman bitched that the right is not dominating on YouTube and says look at the data that progressives put out which shows more support for their agenda and causes. Kulinski said the  right-wing is more authoritarian.

Pakman wondered why commercial talk radio was dominated by pro-business speakers who have anti-tax less spending. these clowns spoke of the corporate powers speaking to promote big business talk  and Pakman for once brought up a good point of the consolidation of media and radio stations becoming bigger demanded more money thanks to the regulation and the creation of bigger conglomerates that would favor a flavor of right-wing money talk. Kulinski and Pakman realized that only big money owners and money talk can afford the rise in costs of operating the airwaves. Of course, Their idea is completely ludicrous as the media is often leftist in its pro-diversity views and there are tons of progressive left-wing billionaires that can afford to buy up and preserve a voice for leftist ideology and thought. These guys also doubted that the success of Fox news and other right wing Toutubers would not have been enabled and have popularity without the spending of these media companies and business wishing to have this platform more highlighted than the obscure following and fake news globalist agenda of these two dumb birds who hurt their political agenda with their obvious bias and they can't comprehend why with so many young progressives living an elite urban life that their names are not as big and making money as Rush Limbaugh and Michael savage.