Dilbert and Dogbert equals a suckle comic strip

Arnold Buckley
   I have often tried to understand Dilbert and have often thought it is pointless. adaptation or spoof about how  boring shit at work and life in an office is for the fools stuck in this type of job. Most of the three panel steps end with an unfunny gag and consist of some of the worse drawn art in the world of character drawing.this comic strip is too businesscentric and too boring to be where it got in today's world and only droopy dudes dig this strip.
Basically this strip is about the dullness of work and perhaps in this achievement it accomplishes its mission. Scott Adams is an awful drawer and writer and should really be ashamed in having his name attached to this strip regardless of the number of deals he is handed out for his dull newspaper strip called Dilbert. Anyone a fan of this lameness cannot really appreciate material if this is what they consider humorous. The worse characteristic this worse of all comic strips is obviously  his dog. One of the worse adaptations to drawing of mans best friend this dogbert is pretty horrible and makes all other comic strip artists with famous dogs in their stars shake their heads in disbelief about Adam's dufus excuse for a dog. This comic strip has no beneficial cultural traits and is just a complete waste of paper wherever you see it printed. This is basically a strip that says how shitty office work can be and just this premise can point out how dull this strip will become. Yet somehow this strip has a following and has been appreciated from mostly the people who can relate to boring experiences of working in an office. They celebrate their dullness by being fans of the dullest comic strip this side of Beetle Bailey.

No comments:

Post a Comment