William McGurn worries about ending of American military occupation around the world

Troy York
   On the anniversary of the end of the Vietnam war William McGurn wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal about the tragedies that fall in an area after America loses a war. I guess he didn't know the tragedy of an area when the United States is waging an aggressive war against the wished of the majority of the population. McGurn says that allies saw this as a sign of weakness that we would no longer fight wars for other people to oppress their poor and oppressed. Guys like McGurn are more concerned about saving face than ending injustice wars that are not on our borders and many thousands of miles away. he says that losing wars brings more tragedy than waging wars and I doubt that the ones waging wars against American colonialism would hardly agree with this analogy of McGurn. if we didn't get involved in these wars then there would be little chance that we could cause worse damage prolonging it and eventually losing the war. This idiot McGurn doesn't write that are involvement is what caused these "boat people" "reeducation camps" and "killing fields is because of the disaster of our involvement and meddling in the affairs of these la ds where these people need to settle the differences and not the advantage of the US military for one side. The scene that so disturbed William of the South Vietnamese rushing to the US embassy when they realized that the rest of their angry countrymen were coming to get them and why wouldn't they since it was these citizens that pushed for American air force to bomb their positions. As long as men like William McGurn and other shave their way with their Republican war hawks this scene will keep getting repeated in the future. Another right wing idiot for the pro-business Wall Street Journal talking out of his ass.

No comments:

Post a Comment